search site
Homeowners and Homebuyers
Real Estate Fraud
Questions from Consumers
Construction Matters
True Trial Stories
TRCC - Texas Residential Construction Commission
TREC-Texas Real Estate Commission
Storm Claims
Texas DTPA
West Fertilizer Plant Explosion
Trial Tips & Strategies
Personal Injury

Judge Graham Quisenberry Refuses to Try Rees Atkins and Piper Pardue on Real Estate Fraud

Rees Atkins and Piper Pardue were hired to sell a property for a seller in Azle, Texas.  The property address is 127 Rodeo Drive, Azle, Texas.  During the listing, Rees Atkins determined that the house was in a flood zone and built on top of a county drainage easement dedicated to the County because an unnamed tributary literally ran through the property.  The house was built directly on top of the unnamed tributary, the drainage easement and the flood zone.  


Rees Atkins & Piper Pardue realized the property could not be sold if the house was on a drainage easement and in a flood zone.  Consequently, Atkins sent an email to the title company and requested that they somehow change the legal designation of the house being in the flood zone and the drainage easement.  This, of course could not be done just because it would slow down sales.  Rees Atkins acknowledged in the email that the house could not sell until those matters were resolved.  The email is listed below. 


Along comes a buyer, Mike & Annette Daniel, who are represented by Deborah Moran.  Atkins never discloses what he already knows and is trying to change about the flood zone and drainage easement.  Instead, he asks his mortgage friend, Reid Mitchell, who is the son-in-law of the owner of Century 21 Lynch, the employer and broker for Pardue and Atkins, to get a flood certification.  He does this because the one obtained by the mortgage company for the Daniels shows the house is in the flood zone.  So Reid Mitchell says he is helping the seller on buying his next house and knows that his mortgage company financed the house. Instead of merely going into his own files where his mortgage company had a flood certification, Mitchell orders a new study and this one says that the house and property are not in the flood zone.  This is given to the buyer?s mortgage company and it proceeds to closing.  The sale is back on track. 


Then, Piper Pardue produces a so called Release of Drainage Easement.  It was sent to the buyers to convince them that the house was not in a drainage easement.  It was a lie and it did not apply to the private property where the house sat. 


So the house is sold and Rees Atkins and Piper Pardue never acknowledge what they know and represent in the email.  Later, they deny knowing any of it because they thought the email was destroyed. 


A lawsuit is filed in Parker County, Texas and it lands in Judge Graham Quisenberry?s court.  The case is set for trial three times and the attorney for Pardue and Atkins files a Motion for Continuance claiming health reasons three times.  The third time is denied and the case is called to trial.  On the day of trial, the attorney for Pardue and Atkins again makes his fourth motion for continuance of the trial and then while in the Judge?s office, the attorney ?collapses?.  The quotes are because nothing really happened other than he acted like he was woozy.  Judge Graham Quisenberry then indicated the case would be continued. 


The plaintiffs elected to try the case against their own realtor, Deborah Moran, and dismiss the case against Pardue and Atkins and refile it against them later so that the case against Moran could proceed.    


The case was tried against Moran, the buyer?s realtor, and the jury found Deborah Moran committed statutory fraud or fraud in a real estate transaction in violation of Chapter 27 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code.  The jury also found that Moran committed knowing violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.  The jury awarded $150,000 in punitive or exemplary damages and attorneys fees.  The jury did not award actual damages.  This meant the jury verdict was inconsistent with itself but Judge Graham Quisenberry refused to correct the matter. 


A new suit was filed against Piper Pardue and Rees Atkins.  They refused to answer based on their attorney, so successful in delays, advice.  A default judgment was filed and at the hearing, Judge Graham Quisenberry went to his office before he signed the Default Judgment and called the attorney for Atkins and Pardue and told him to answer the lawsuit.  The attorney refused based on his ignorance of the law.  The judge signed the default judgment for $1.2 million dollars which represented the price of the house and additional damages allowed by the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.  He then stated, ?I?m probably not going to let you keep it.?


He was true to his word.  On that. 


After the judgment was entered, Atkins and Pardue filed their answers and asked the Judge Quisenberry to overturn the default judgment.  Eight months after the trial with Moran ? the trial where the attorney became ?woozy? in Judge Quisenberry?s office ? there was finally an answer.  Another successful delay of justice. 


Once the Default Judgment was thrown out by Judge Quisenberry, Pardue and Atkins were back before the Court.  But this time they had no attorney.  Their insurance carrier fired the law firm.  What is interesting is how they would have known the law firm made any mistakes.  It could have come from the law firm.  Or even the clients.  Not to mention the court.


At that point, the law firm for Pardue and Atkins withdrew or quit.  Multiple requests were made to the Court to set the case for trial.  All of the discovery had taken place.  The case only needed a trial.  But the court ? Judge Quisenberry- refused.   Even when there was no law firm or attorney of record, the Judge refused to grant a trial date, even though the lawyers for Pardue and Atkins had just wasted eight months and shunned their noses at the duty to answer a lawsuit. 


Eventually, within about three weeks from the overturn of the Default Judgment, an attorney named Brent Lee in Dallas contacted Plaintiffs attorney and indicated he was reviewing the file and considering entering an appearance to represent Pardue and Atkins. 

This was most unusual since law firms rarely turn down hourly business from an insurance company.  There were obviously no conflicts of interest since he was reviewing the file.  After he had reviewed the file, he indicated his firm was going to pass on representing Pardue and Atkins. 


At that point, the Court ? Judge Quisenberry- still refused to set the case for trial.  It was now nine months later and the Court did nothing to penalize Pardue and Atkins? disdain for the rules of procedure by ignoring the duty to answer the suit. 


And then a new lawyer entered the case.  This lawyer was not a real estate attorney nor was he an insurance defense  attorney.  He was connected to Judge Quisenberry.  He was close friends with the Judge?s nephew and played in a band with the younger Quisenberry.  How these defendants ended up with a law firm that did not normally do real estate defense or insurance defense is very odd. 


So Judge Quisenberry?s nephew?s bandmate enters the case.  The Court still won?t give a trial date.  Eventually, the Court sets the date in October. 


The new attorney calls up Plaintiffs? counsel and advises him to take the sum of $20,000 or else the case will be dismissed.  A lot of attorneys have confidence.  This one spoke as if it was a foregone conclusion that the case against Pardue and Atkins would never see the light of day and he had only been on the case one day.  This was puzzling since the facts in the case were devastating to Pardue and Atkins. 


When a powerpoint presentation from the mediation in the earlier case was given to the attorney, he dismissed it as irrelevant.  This was highly unusual behavior from any attorney and especially one who just entered a case and really knew nothing about witness demeanors, etc.  He also seemed to know an inordinate amount about the trial. 

He was aware of nuances that only the Plaintiff attorney, the attorney for Moran and the Judge would know. 


The attorney for Moran claims he never spoke to the new attorney for Pardue and Atkins.  Still, even if a few days into the case, he had a copy of the entire trial transcript, he would never understand the tenor of the case. 


It was chalked up as just an overly cocky attorney that made his living by bluster and attempted intimidation.


A Motion for Summary Judgment was filed and set during the time counsel for Plaintiff had a driving trip to Washington State planned.  A motion to continue the hearing was made and the Court summarily denied it.  The Court, having granted three continuances and indulged every possible delay by the defendants Pardue and Atkins, could not even move the Summary Judgment hearing to accommodate the counsel for Plaintiffs.


In open court, Judge Quisenberry stated he would never make a lawyer attend a hearing while he had a vacation letter filed.  This was not true.  Refusing to move the date, the Court, Judge Quisenberry, then held the hearing. 


The hearing was really only about one legal issue ? Collateral Estoppel.  This legal theory says that a court can not relitigate the same issues twice.  The poorly written motion by Pardue?s and Atkins? new attorneys claimed that the jury had already determined all of the fact issues in the case against Moran.  Even a first year law student can understand that the fraud claims against Moran, the real estate agent for the buyers, were different from the fraud claims against Pardue and Atkins, the realtors for the sellers.  They involve completely different facts and proof.  There was no conspiracy claim only a fraud claim. 


In a fraud case, the jury has to answer whether each person committed fraud.  It can not be shared like the negligence in a car accident.  Despite this fundamental legal premise, Judge Quisenberry granted the Motion for Summary Judgment and found that Pardue and Atkins were free to sell more property the way they sell property.  Apparently, Judge Quisenberry could not see how the fraud committed by Atkins and Pardue was not the same issue the jury considered in the first trial.  He saw both acts of fraud to be the same thing.   Even Moran denied knowing about the email below.  It was discovered in the Title company records and even after trying the case, Moran?s attorney claimed he didn?t know about it.  So how could Judge Quisenberry even begin to think these were the same issues?  How could he ignore the requirements that Moran?s fraud be submitted differently from Atkins? fraud which had to be submitted separately from Pardue?s fraud?  It didn?t make any legal sense for Judge Quisenberry to do this.  Yet he did.   


Shortly after Judge Quisenberry saved Pardue and Atkins and their employer, Century 21 Lynch,  from a trial over the email and why they didn?t disclose what they knew, the Daniels let the house on the drainage easement, in a flood zone, go.  Chase Bank owns it now.  Anyone who buys that house better hope they never have to go to court over the disclosures.  


God Help them if they file suit in Judge Graham Quisenberry?s court.



Previous Entry
What To Do After a Hurricane Step 4B: What NOT to say to the Insurance Company

Be Careful What You Say to an Insurance Company After a Hurricane
Next Entry
Can Filing a Lawsuit Affect Market Value? Too Much Expert, Not Enough Common Sense

Filing a Lawsuit will not affect market value by itself, but overinflated expert opinions will.
All entries
4/1/2018 - Texas DTPA and Home Warranties
11/9/2017 - Hurricane Harvey: Now that the Insurance Adjuster Has Denied My Claim
8/28/2017 - What to Do After Harvey
7/18/2017 - Vortens Toilets
6/25/2017 - Realtor Trying to Intervene in Lawsuit
6/24/2017 - Plumbing Problems in Older Homes
6/23/2017 - Here is the One to Four Family Residential Contract (Resale)
6/22/2017 - Sales Pressure When Buying a House
6/21/2017 - How Does An Option Period Work?
6/20/2017 - What If I Find House Defects When I am Buying a House?
6/19/2017 - How Much For Home Inspections?
5/20/2017 - Texas Realtors Not Required to Have Insurance
4/26/2017 - Strike Out Paragraph 7d of the One to Four Family Residential Contract for Sale (Resale) TREC Form 20-13
4/25/2017 - "AS IS" Again, and Again
4/24/2017 - "AS IS" AGAIN
4/19/2017 - DTPA & REAL ESTATE V
4/18/2017 - DTPA and Real Estate IV
4/17/2017 - Is a Home Inspection Required?
4/16/2017 - DTPA in Real Estate III
4/15/2017 - DTPA in Real Estate II
4/14/2017 - DTPA in Real Estate I
4/12/2017 - Options in Earnest Money Contracts
4/11/2017 - What You Know Before You Buy
4/10/2017 - Find Out What You Can Buy First
4/9/2017 - Flooding and Drainage
1/15/2017 - J. Alexander Properties Tries To Evict Tenant Over A Cat
12/27/2016 - Termite Damage Continues
12/12/2016 - Look for a Local Attorney
8/20/2016 - DTPA Primer Review
8/19/2016 - Ask To Talk To the Seller Directly
8/18/2016 - My Reponse to Home Inspectors
8/17/2016 - A Home Inspection Is a Feel Good Moment To Encourage You To Buy A House
8/16/2016 - Home Inspectors Respond
1/8/2016 - Home Inspection Hype
12/28/2015 - Flood Damage Disclosed
12/19/2015 - Trusting Your Realtor
12/17/2015 - Who Does the Buyer's Agent Work For?
12/15/2015 - Your Buyer's Agent Is Cheating On You!
9/29/2015 - Is TAR 1407 A Required Form?
9/9/2015 - Monster Termites!
9/8/2015 - Biting Termites
8/17/2015 - Should I Disclose This?
8/15/2015 - Termite Swarmers
8/14/2015 - HOA Blues
5/16/2015 - Ashley Ellerin: A Long Tradition of Excellence
5/4/2015 - Evin G. Dugas
3/13/2015 - What You Don't Know About Septics Can Cost You Big
1/19/2015 - Good Fences Make Good Neighbors
1/17/2015 - Building Envelopes
1/15/2015 - What Is a Warranty Claim?
1/13/2015 - What Can You Do If Your Builder Has Gone Out of Business?
1/11/2015 - Small Claims Court Primer
1/9/2015 - Elements of a Case
1/7/2015 - Texas Association of Realtors "TAR" Opposes Price Disclosure
1/5/2015 - Heh Texas Homebuyer, You Just Bought that House "AS IS"
12/26/2014 - Texas Is the Anti Consumer State
11/28/2014 - Midland Reporter Telegram
11/24/2014 - Unpermitted Repairs
10/4/2014 - A Home Inspection Controversy
10/2/2014 - A Home Inspection is Still a Waste of Time
9/25/2014 - Confirm Repairs Made By Sellers
9/23/2014 - Ten Tips for Selling Your House
9/21/2014 - Home Seller Tips
9/19/2014 - Flood Damage But No Flood Insurance
9/17/2014 - Flooding Damage
9/15/2014 - Kitec Connectors
9/13/2014 - Stucco Damage In New Homes
9/11/2014 - "AS IS" IS NOT ABSOLUTE
9/3/2014 - Schumacher Homes Threatens Arbitration
9/1/2014 - Document What Your Builder Says in Writing
8/30/2014 - IPEX PRODUCT RECALL AUGUST 2, 2005
8/28/2014 - Do I Have to Join the IPEX KItec Class Action Law Suit?
8/26/2014 - Kitec Plumbing Connections-IPEX
7/11/2014 - Top Ten Most Litigated House Defects-No. 4: Window Leaks
6/14/2014 - What Can You Do After You Bought Your House in Texas "AS IS"
6/11/2014 - What Can Texas Home Buyers Do About the New "AS IS" Clause in the Earnest Money Contract?
6/8/2014 - Texas Home Buyers Beware: Texas Is the Anti Consumer State
6/8/2014 - You Can't Trust Realtors In Texas
5/20/2014 - How To Prepare For A Deposition
4/13/2014 - Real Estate Fraud Heats Up In Active Markets
4/12/2014 - Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act
4/4/2014 - Top Ten Most Commonly Litigated House Defects
4/3/2014 - Top Ten Most Commonly Litigated House Defects: Number Two - Foundations
4/2/2014 - Top Ten Most Commonly Litigated House Defects: Number One - Termite Damage
4/1/2014 - Top Ten Most Commonly Litigated House Defects
2/24/2014 - Roof Damage Claims
1/24/2014 - Engineering Fees Under the RCLA
1/23/2014 - Do I Have Statutory Warranties if the TRCC has been abolished?
1/15/2014 - What if I Already Know About Construction Defects Before My Home is Finished?
1/14/2014 - What is the Difference Between a Formosan Termite and a Native Termite?
1/13/2014 - What is the Termite's Natural Enemy in Texas?
1/12/2014 - What Kind of Damage Do Termites Do?
1/11/2014 - Termite Damage Means Negligent Treatment
1/10/2014 - What if I Don't Want To Buy the House Anymore?
1/9/2014 - What If I Don't Want To Buy the House Anymore?
12/13/2013 - Non Disclosure Is Alive and Well In Texas
11/12/2013 - Is Your Flood Damage Caused by Someone Else?
11/11/2013 - Flood Victim? Is it Mother Nature or Man that Caused it?
10/7/2013 - Top Ten Collectable Case Issues: Number Five
10/5/2013 - Top Ten Collectable Case Issues: Number Five
10/3/2013 - Top Ten Case Collectablility Issues: Number 4
10/1/2013 - Top Ten Case Evaluations for Collectability: Number 3
9/30/2013 - Top 10 Collectable Case Evaluation: 2. Is there Insurance Coverage?
9/28/2013 - Top 10 Case Collectablility Evaluation: Is there Insurance?
9/26/2013 - Three(3) Parts of a Good Case
9/24/2013 - Top Ten Questions To Ask Before You Take a Case
9/17/2013 - MLS Listings & Flyers Eliminate AS IS
9/16/2013 - No AS IS with Sellers Disclosure Notice
9/15/2013 - Keep a Log of All Insurance Company Contact
9/14/2013 - Big Storms Mean Insurance Claims
9/13/2013 - Bad Drainage
9/12/2013 - Dick Hargis Was One of a Kind
9/11/2013 - How Much Detail In a DTPA Notice Letter?
9/1/2013 - Personal Injury Claims: What To Do Next
8/21/2013 - The Lawyers' Bluff
7/19/2013 - Who Is At Fault for My "Stucco Damage"?
7/15/2013 - The Sleeping Juror
7/13/2013 - Why Is There Wood Rot Behind My Stucco Walls?
7/9/2013 - How Does Water Get Behind Stucco?
6/22/2013 - Stucco Problems
6/21/2013 - Home Owner Association versus the Developer
6/20/2013 - Tell Tale Signs of Fraud in a New Home Purchase
6/19/2013 - Real Estate Fraud Revisited
6/18/2013 - Home Buyer Finds Evidence of Fraud Three (3) Hours After Closing
6/11/2013 - Subpoenaing a Witness
6/10/2013 - Termite Swarmers Mean Damage In Your Home
6/9/2013 - When Buying a House, Talk to the Neighbors
6/8/2013 - Do I Disclose This?
6/7/2013 - Trial Objections
6/6/2013 - Trying Cases in the Old Days... the 1990s
6/5/2013 - Attorney Beats Pillow With Baseball Bat
6/4/2013 - And Now You Will Hear From the Plaintiff Elizabeth Boquer...
6/3/2013 - I Vote No
6/2/2013 - Plaintiff Arrested While Testifying on the Stand
6/1/2013 - Small Claims Court
5/24/2013 - HOA Refuses To Repair Common Areas
5/23/2013 - Homeowner Association Blues
5/22/2013 - Underinsured Homes in West, Texas and Everywhere Else
5/17/2013 - Termites and Termite Damage
5/15/2013 - West Fertilizer House Claims
5/11/2013 - My Sewer Line is Clogged, Can I Go Against My Builder if it is out of Warranty?
4/29/2013 - What is a Weep Screed & Why Do I Need It?
4/28/2013 - West Explosion Legal Help
4/28/2013 - Stucco Water Damage Problems
4/27/2013 - West Fertilizer Explosion Legal Help
4/26/2013 - West Fertilizer Explosion Legal Help
4/25/2013 - West Fertilizer Plant Explosion
3/30/2013 - Commercial Real Estate in Texas
3/28/2013 - Commercial Real Estate in Texas
3/26/2013 - Austin Real Estate Attorney
3/24/2013 - Austin Real Estate Lawyer
3/22/2013 - Why Do Real Estate Agents Lie?
3/20/2013 - Condo Ownership and HOA Power Condo Ownership and HOA Power Condo Ownership and HOA Power
2/14/2013 - Who Is a DTPA Consumer?
2/13/2013 - DTPA Responses for Defendants
2/12/2013 - HOA Management Fees
2/11/2013 - DTPA Notice Letter Response: Basics
2/8/2013 - Keller Williams Prefers to Settle Their Cases
2/7/2013 - HOA Fees Going Up
2/6/2013 - Texas DTPA Defense Attorney
2/5/2013 - Texas DTPA Defense Attorney
2/4/2013 - TREC Inspectors Committee Meeting
1/30/2013 - Does My Builder Have Insurance?
10/20/2012 - What Happens After a DTPA Inspection?
10/18/2012 - Who Can Go To A DTPA Inspection?
10/16/2012 - What Happens at a DTPA Inspection?
9/22/2012 - How Long Does A DTPA Inspection Last?
9/20/2012 - Texas DTPA Inspection
9/18/2012 - Texas Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples Abandoned Consumers
7/28/2012 - Talk to Your Surveyor Before Closing
7/26/2012 - Flood Claims
7/24/2012 - When to Expect Problems With a Septic System
7/22/2012 - What Do I Do About a Septic System If I Am Buying?
7/20/2012 - Can I Stop Paying My HOA Dues?
7/18/2012 - Can I Stop My Neighbor From Building?
7/16/2012 - What If the HOA Will Not Make Repairs It Is Supposed To Make?
7/14/2012 - Homeowner Association Dues
7/12/2012 - Can an HOA Enforce Their Rules?
7/10/2012 - Septic Inspections
7/8/2012 - Call Jeff Tucker About Termite in Houston, Texas or Anywhere
5/31/2012 - What do Blanks on the Sellers' Disclosure Form Mean?
5/29/2012 - Can a Realtor Commit Real Estate Fraud?
5/27/2012 - What is Real Estate Fraud?
5/25/2012 - Is It True That I Don't Have to Disclose Repairs My Builder Made?
5/23/2012 - Will the Home Inspector Tell Me About the Leaks in a Roof? Not if it exhausts him...
5/21/2012 - Does a Home Inspector Have to Go Into My Attic?
5/19/2012 - What Standards Does a Home Inspector Use for the Roof?
5/16/2012 - Should I Hire an Engineer for My Foundation Inspection?
5/14/2012 - What standards does the "home" inspector use for foundations?
5/12/2012 - A Home Inspection is a Waste of Time and Money
5/10/2012 - What is HADD? What is What is: Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings? What is HADD?
5/9/2012 - Do I Need a Current Survey?
5/7/2012 - Can I Read a Title Commitment Without a Survey? NO! NO! NO!
5/5/2012 - Do You Have to Read a Title Commitment?
5/3/2012 - What Do I Look For In a Title Commitment?
3/8/2012 - Key 4 To Buying a House in 2012: Get Questions Answered by the Home Sellers in Writing
3/7/2012 - Final Walk Through Before Closing
3/3/2012 - Hourly versus Contingent Fee Attorneys
3/2/2012 - Does My Contractor or Home Builder Have Insurance?
3/1/2012 - Why is The Realtor Calling? What's Up With That?
2/29/2012 - Questions about Home Sale in Indiana
2/22/2012 - What Really Happens When Buying a House
2/20/2012 - Can I Get Mental Anguish Damages in My DTPA Claim?
2/18/2012 - Key 3 - Keys to Buying a House in 2012
2/16/2012 - Don't Allow an Intermediary Relationship in Residential Real Estate
2/14/2012 - Don't Agree to an Intermediary Agency or Brokerage
2/2/2012 - Key 2: Buying a House in 2012
1/12/2012 - Key 1 - Keys to Buying a House in 2012
1/11/2012 - Keys to Buying a Home in 2012
10/19/2011 - Can Filing a Lawsuit Affect Market Value? Too Much Expert, Not Enough Common Sense
10/7/2011 - Texas Real Estate Commission "TREC" Says No Intent to Make Earnest Money Contract an "AS IS" Contract
10/7/2011 - Step 5: AFTER A HURRICANE
10/7/2011 - Judge Graham Quisenberry Refuses to Try Rees Atkins and Piper Pardue on Real Estate Fraud
9/2/2011 - What To Do After a Hurricane Step 4B: What NOT to say to the Insurance Company
9/1/2011 - Step 4 After a Hurricane; Contact Your Agent
9/1/2011 - What to Do After a Hurricane: Step 4A: Record Your Contacts with the Insurance Company
8/9/2011 - After Taking Video and Photos, Protect Your Home and Property. Step 3 After a Hurricane
8/6/2011 - Dick Hargis: The Master of Sincerity
8/5/2011 - After a hurricane, What Do I send the Adjustor? Step 2 After a Hurricane
8/4/2011 - 1st Step After Hurricane - TAKE PICTURES & VIDEO!
8/2/2011 - What to Do After a Hurricane or Storm
8/1/2011 - Hurricane and Storm Policies Pay Your Legal Fees
7/20/2011 - Do I Need a New Survey?
5/24/2011 - True Trial Stories: We Can't Speak French During Voir Dire
5/23/2011 - Stopping Foreclosure
5/23/2011 - True Trial Story: The Witness Just Left...No Direct, No Questions, Just Left the Courtroom
5/19/2011 - Septic System Advice for Home Buyers
5/17/2011 - True Trial Stories: You Can Take Off Your Sunglasses Now...
5/17/2011 - Septic Systems Have to Be Checked
5/3/2011 - We Built You a House, Now You F#@$%#@ Like It!
5/3/2011 - True Trial Stories: The Sleeping Defendant
4/21/2011 - Termites Mean Damage
4/18/2011 - Home Seller Not Liable
4/18/2011 - True Trial Story: Sentenced to Jail in the Middle of Trial
4/13/2011 - True Trial Story: Some Phone Calls HAVE to be answered...
4/8/2011 - True Trial Story: Don't Wake the Judge
4/6/2011 - Termite Swarmers
4/4/2011 - Home Buyer Tip of the Week: Talk to the Seller Yourself
4/1/2011 - Realtors Set to Vote to Set Realtors Free from the DTPA
3/30/2011 - Texas Legislature Gives Realtors a "Get out of Jail Free" Card
2/18/2011 - Lennar Homes Backs Out of Settlement
2/17/2011 - Lennar Homes Refuses to Honor Settlement
1/14/2011 - Real Estate Fraud Story: The Report They Forgot to Destroy
10/20/2010 - Rusty Jenney IS the BEST Termite Inspector in Texas
10/13/2010 - Don't Rely on a Real Estate Agent
10/12/2010 - Builders Rely on Their Lawyers to Cover the Truth
10/11/2010 - Utilice la ley. Está aquí para usted.
6/17/2010 - Homebuilders Hate Juries
3/1/2010 - Real Estate Fraud in Texas
2/17/2010 - Make Your Realtor Get the Answer in Writing
2/15/2010 - Ask for Previous Disclosures
2/12/2010 - Why Do Realtors Lie?
2/11/2010 - Septic System Disclosures
10/8/2009 - Why Realtors Like Home Inspectors
9/16/2009 - Termite Inspection is a Waste of Time
9/14/2009 - END CONSUMER ARBITRATION NOW! Reason No. 1
9/11/2009 - Texas Real Estate Commission is There to Help Realtors, Not Consumers
5/14/2009 - Keeping the TRCC Alive - And Killing Homeowner's Hopes of Quality Building
3/23/2009 - House Has Unpermitted Repairs that are Causing Mold
3/20/2009 - Homeowner Wants to Know if Rotted Roof Trusses and A/C Non-Disclosure are Fraud
3/3/2009 - So Your Client Wants a Bigger House...
2/25/2009 - Disclose Everything!
2/23/2009 - What If I Can't Attend the Inspections?
2/18/2009 - How Long Can the TRCC Take?
2/17/2009 - All Used Home Sales in Texas are "AS IS"
10/25/2008 - Do Builder Repairs Have to Be Disclosed?
10/23/2008 - Disclose Everything!
10/3/2008 - What is a Mediation?
10/1/2008 - How To Get an Honest Appraisal
9/25/2008 - Mortgage Fraud
2/27/2008 - Subdivision Drainage
2/20/2008 - Why Termite Inspectors Can't Find Termites
1/23/2008 - Why a Home Inspection is Not What You Think it Is
1/17/2008 - Trusting Your Home Inspector
1/16/2008 - Home Inpectors Respond to My Criticism
1/16/2008 - How To Pick a Home Inspector
1/4/2008 - Beware of Home Inspectors
12/26/2007 - Intermediary Agent Scam
12/19/2007 - What is an Intermediary Agent?
12/12/2007 - Ask Your Neighbor
11/28/2007 - Does Seller Have To Disclose Old Defects & Conditions?
11/21/2007 - When Real Estate Disclosures NOT Required
10/29/2007 - The TRCC aka "The Builders Defense Program"
10/22/2007 - The Texas Residential Construction Commission
9/26/2007 - House Foundation Settlement
9/19/2007 - Homeowners for Better Building (HOBB) is another national organization to assist you when you have a new home construction defect.
9/18/2007 - Builder Fails to Attend SIRP Inspection
9/13/2007 - Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings (HADD) is a Resource When your New Home Has a Construction Defect
9/2/2007 - Water damage and termites in our homes.
8/22/2007 - Construction Defects and Water Damage
8/19/2007 - The Importance of Keeping Good Records When Things Don't Go Right
8/16/2007 - Construction Defects and the Mortgage Subprime Market Hurts All of Us
8/15/2007 - Being a Witness in a Construction Defects Case
8/13/2007 - Free Speech
7/19/2007 - Texas Residential Construction Commission Is Bad for Texans
7/3/2007 - Lennar Homes is the Biggest, Does That Mean They are the Bestare Good
6/5/2007 - Is ReMax Really Behind Your Agent?
Evin G. Dugas - Attorney at Law 512.261.0044
2303 RR 620 South,   Suite 135 PMB 361,   Austin, Texas 78734
© Copyright 2018 Evin G. Dugas - Attorney at Law, All Rights Reserved SITE DESIGN AND HOSTING BY SITESTREET.COM